Got a tip for us? Share it...
• • RSS

Apple seeking Low-Density Flash Supplier

Monday November 14, 2005 8:27 am PST by Arnold Kim
Digitimes reports that Apple is looking for quotes for low-density NAND flash from Hynix Semiconductor.

Apple presently receives most of its supply of flash chips from Samsung and Toshiba, but due to high demand for these products, Apple is looking towards Hynix to fulfill their low-density needs for the iPod shuffle. With increased supplies of products available, overall pricing for these parts is expected to decline further.
[ 11 comments ]

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

Avatar
Mord
82 months ago
this is most likely for regular ipod cacheing flash memory, current ipods use 256-bit modules if i remember correctly.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
Avatar
longofest
82 months ago
... and because it's from digitimes, it MUST be accurate...

Page 2 rumor folks... and because it's from digitimes, take it with a bigger grain of salt than normal. Maybe, take the entire Nevada salt flats...
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
Avatar
Eidorian
82 months ago

this is most likely for regular ipod cacheing flash memory, current ipods use 256-bit modules if i remember correctly.

Yeah, caching video with 32 MB just doesn't cut it on the 30 GB model. The 60 GB one has 64 MB which is much more tolerable. I'm waiting for 128-256 MB of cache though. :cool:
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
Avatar
JDOG_
82 months ago

Yeah, caching video with 32 MB just doesn't cut it on the 30 GB model. The 60 GB one has 64 MB which is much more tolerable. I'm waiting for 128-256 MB of cache though. :cool:


Aren't we all.

I'd love to see a larger cache, and with the inclusion of video, it's an obvious next step of the internals. Although, doesn't a larger chip require quite a bit more power? I'd assume it's generally less than HD spin-up though.

Seems like the weakest link on the iPod...besides the screen these days :p
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
Avatar
longofest
82 months ago

Although, doesn't a larger chip require quite a bit more power?


Not when it's flash memory. If it's RAM, then it would require more power, but flash is non-volitile, so I'm pretty sure it doesn't require more power. But remember that any power requirements that you talk about in regards to memory are negligable compared to HD spinup.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
Avatar
Lacero
82 months ago

this is most likely for regular ipod cacheing flash memory, current ipods use 256-bit modules if i remember correctly.

Welcome back, Hector. :)

Is Digitimes to be trusted? Shuffles are likely to get a boost in capacity for 2006 so Apple is shopping around for 512 and 1Gbit modules. Hardly unexpected.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
Avatar
shamino
82 months ago

this is most likely for regular ipod cacheing flash memory, current ipods use 256-bit modules if i remember correctly.

Ummmm.... Why in the world would an iPod use flash memory for cache?

Ordinary DRAM would be far more appropriate, faster, and less expensive.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
Avatar
Eidorian
82 months ago

Aren't we all.

I'd love to see a larger cache, and with the inclusion of video, it's an obvious next step of the internals. Although, doesn't a larger chip require quite a bit more power? I'd assume it's generally less than HD spin-up though.

Seems like the weakest link on the iPod...besides the screen these days :p

320 x 240 is fine for me. I want to keep my iPod within tolerable width and squinting size. Any smaller than 2.5" for watching video and they're really pushing it. Now, DivX/XviD and scaling support. I'm up for that. :D

Does scaling video kill the battery life even more? I have 512 x 384 video at 1015 kb/s. I converted it to iPod ready at 320 x 240 at 810 kb/s. Seems kinda silly to convert when I can scale.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
Avatar
javiercr
82 months ago
If the thing works (ie plays videos on its screen resolution) what do you care of how much cache it has?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
Avatar
Mord
82 months ago
more cache more battery life, but it's diminishing returns as your more and more likely to change playlists before the cache needs refilling.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]