Got a tip for us? Share it...

iTunes Competitors Line Up (Samsung, Sprint)

The Korea Times reports that Samsung is currently in talks with their partners to "debute a service program like iTunes of Apple. Our No. 1 priority is to help customers use our products with ease".

Ironically, Samsung is the company which is supplying Apple with the NAND Flash memory for the iPod nano.

Meanwhile, Sprint Nextel has launched the first US music download service aimed at mobile phone users.

The Sprint Music Store enables Sprint customers to download songs for $2.50/each. Sprint has lined up 250,000 songs from all four major music labels. For $2.50, customers get both a lower-quality phone version as well as the high-quality (WMA) version for their PC.

The pricing of the Sprint service, almost two-a-half-times the 99 cents that iTunes charges for a download, reflects the belief among mobile carriers that consumers will pay a premium to buy music while they are on the move, an assumption some analysts dispute.


Comparisons, of course, are made with the Motorola ROKR iTunes capable phone. As previously reported, Apple does not offer over-the-air iTunes purchasing. Instead, requiring you to copy songs over from your PC or Mac.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

82 months ago
I would love to be able to buy songs on the go.
I was recently in Berlin for a shoot, my wife had the ibook at home. I wanted to buy some new music for the dull nights at the hotel, but with no ibbok there was no way to get them on my ipod.
I found myself fantazising about buying music via my phone, but for 2,5 times the price?
Forget it.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
82 months ago
too expensive

:rolleyes: :rolleyes:
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
82 months ago

too expensive

:rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Yeah I really can't see paying that much for it but I'm sure there are some people who will.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
82 months ago
People will buy one or two songs at that price for a ring tone, but not more than that. Some companies are a bit too greedy for their own good, hurting their brand name with smart consumers in the process.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
82 months ago
At that price, I may use the service once every couple of years. No more.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
82 months ago
You'd think for $2.50 each, Sprint would have secured more than a quarter million songs. Surely the record companies would love to give you access to their entire libraries if people (suckers) will buy them for that outrageous price.

I know people are stupid, but I really can't see this going anywhere.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
82 months ago

You'd think for $2.50 each, Sprint would have secured more than a quarter million songs. Surely the record companies would love to give you access to their entire libraries if people (suckers) will buy them for that outrageous price.

I know people are stupid, but I really can't see this going anywhere.


You really think record companies are seeing most of that 2.50? This isn't like the iTunes Music store, where the record companies get most of the dough. This looks to be Spring/Nextel getting a lot more cash/song, especially since they have to recover costs of using a much more expensive distribution medium.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
82 months ago

much more expensive distribution medium.

don't forget that in this case they own the distribution medium
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
82 months ago


...reflects the belief among mobile carriers that consumers will pay a premium to buy music while they are on the move...


Why do they have cause to believe this? Because suckers pay a buck for a ring or something?

I hate people. All of them.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
82 months ago

I hate people. All of them.


Me too
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]