Got a tip for us? Share it...

Apple vs Music Industry on Song Pricing

Businessweek recaps the recent exchanges between Steve Jobs and Edgar Bronfan - chief executive of Warner Music. At the heart of the matter is the debate between fixed $.99 pricing for music downloads vs a tiered model.

"There's no content in the world that has doesn't have some price flexibility," Bronfman pointed out. "Not all songs are created equal. Not all albums are created equal."


Steve Jobs has insisted that the $.99 price point is appropriate and feels that higher pricing will turn consumers back towards piracy.

Businessweek reports that Apple's licensing agreements with the Music Industry runs out in early 2006. Apple may continue to hold the advantage in these licensing negotiations as it cements its hold on the music player market. Meanwhile, Apple's recent entry into the Flash-based MP3 player market with the iPod nano may provide it with an even wider lead.

Apple's lock on large quantities of flash at a substantial discount will make it difficult to other companies to compete, and provide Steve Jobs and Apple the leverage to keep music prices where they are. Apple is rumored to be securing more flash supplies with a deal with Hynix Semiconductor.

The new flash memory from Samsung is a new Multi-Level Cell type which is 30-40% cheaper than the more common SLC type that many competitors use. Samsung defends its established deal with Apple:

It's true that the company that has the largest market will have the edge. Buying 100 units and buying one can't be same.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

83 months ago



Businessweek recaps the recent exchanges between Steve Jobs and Edgar Bronfan - chief executive of Warner Music. At the heart of the matter is the debate between fixed $.99 pricing for music downloads vs a tiered model.



Steve Jobs has insisted that the $.99 price point is appropriate and feels that higher pricing will turn consumers back towards piracy...
:


I'm okay with this...

...as long as $.99 is the high end of the pricing scale!
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
83 months ago
With the contracts running out, what would happen if the record labels decided to not renew because of their disagreement? Would we really see a great loss of music in the iTMS?
-Chase
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
83 months ago

I'm okay with this...

...as long as $.99 is the high end of the pricing scale!


I think everyone would be alright with it if that was the case, but Steve has said that it's higher pricing.

*shakes fist at someone*
-Chase
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
83 months ago
Tiered pricing, sure. So they think songs are worth more than others, fine. Anyone want to guess how many "bad" songs are priced below 99¢? I'm going to guess zero. Scumbags are just trying to disguise/justify a price increase any way they can.

EDIT: typo...
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
83 months ago
Hmmm, those multi-level cell type flash memory sound interesting - I wonder what the roadmap for that looks like...

how high will that flash storage capacity go? and how fast?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
83 months ago
yes this really is Just a case of the music labels being greedy. they didn't care about this when the itms opened did they but now that its the biggest out there they want variable pricing etc. I think that It should stay 99c a song If they moved up the price I doubt people would react well to it.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
83 months ago
Apple's "recent entry into the flash-based MP3 market with the nano?" Huh? Someone didn't do their research...
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
83 months ago
These guys don't get it. Free vs 99 cents is hard enough to keep up, but free vs a dollar two dollars? If this happens online piracy will take off again.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
83 months ago
Jobs doesn't really have much leverage against them. No matter how popular the iPod is the iTMS isn't the iPod and its still a small blip on the map for the total number of music sales.

Jobs is a very persuasive speaker and we all hope he can because 40% of computer users will have iPods by 2008 I think if the current trend stays true. (Read that somewhere)

I love the fixed price model, and its great for indie bands, because everyone for the first time is equal. Thats great and is putting more people on the map. I know as someone who has bought 1000 songs on iTMS since it opened, it anything is greater than a $1 per song, i will use LimeWire again, and I have gone completely legal.



Its their choice.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
83 months ago

Tiered pricing, sure. So they think songs are worth more than others, fine. Anyone want to guess how many "bad" songs are priced below 99¢? I'm going to guess zero. Scumbags are just trying to disguise/justify a price increase any way they can.

Tiered pricing is OK but how do you discriminate what goes below 99cts and what goes above? Though I wouldn't mind paying more for the works of MJ.

Nevertheless, Apple will focus more on iPod sales than increasing the profitability of record companies. Will Steve Jobs win? I am leaning towards a 'fair compromise'
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]