Got a tip for us? Share it...

Intel's Plans for Low-Power Chips

Cnet reports on Intel's road maps which were discussed at the Intel Developer's Forum today.

...the dominant theme revolves around reducing power consumption, a concept the company has hammered on since the beginning of the decade.


The newer architecture pushing the higher performance per watt appears to be targeted in late 2006. In the meanwhile, Intel has other chips coming to fill the gap in late 2005/early 2006.

Notebooks:
Yonah - notebook chip. 1st half of 2006.
Merom - notebook chip coming in the second half of 2006. 5 watts (vs 22 in today's chips)

Desktops:
Presler - Desktop chip based on Pentium 4 line. 1st half of 2006.
Conroe - Desktop counterpart to Merom. Late 2006. up to 65 watts. (vs 95)

Servers:
Paxville - late 2005. Dual core.
Woodcrest - Server processor, up to 80 watts. (vs 110)

The newly announced chips (Meron, Conroe and Woodcrest) aimed at late 2006 will utilize the new architecture (65-nm) to replace the aging Pentium 4 architecture. Apple anticipates their first Intel-based Macs to start shipping in 2006 and the transition to be complete by the end of 2007.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

85 months ago
Can not wait, its going to be amazing!!
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
85 months ago

Can not wait, its going to be amazing!!


I agree I think this switch needed to happen and will only make things better for mac users... Never thought I would say this but go intel :o
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
85 months ago
I can already see it...MWSF...me watching the live stream keynote when Steve announces the New Intel Powerbooks! It'll be just in time for me to order one when I start grad school. Oh yeah!

I know, I know...wishful thinking. But a guy's got to have dreams!
:rolleyes:
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
85 months ago
FANTASTIC,

wondering if the powerbooks will have, specially made processors exclusive for apple.

could anyone put the performance bumo into perspective compared to theG4s or G5

cool
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
85 months ago

I agree I think this switch needed to happen and will only make things better for mac users... Never thought I would say this but go intel :o


I think we should wait and see. IBM promised 3 GHz, which seemed like a really good thing, and everyone thought that the switch from Motorola to IBM needed to happen. I agree that it made things better, but we're still not at 3 GHz, more than a year later than we were supposed to have it. My point: Just because Intel promises great things, that doesn't mean they are going to happen. Didn't Intel also promise 4 GHz P4's?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
85 months ago
I know there are people against Mactel, but this sounds good. the next gen macs are going to be powerhouses
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
85 months ago
Dang... I was we could have this chips right now in our Macs... I cant wait! This is the best thing thats ever gonna happen to Apple!! (besides the iMac) :D
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
85 months ago

I think we should wait and see. IBM promised 3 GHz, which seemed like a really good thing, and everyone thought that the switch from Motorola to IBM needed to happen. I agree that it made things better, but we're still not at 3 GHz, more than a year later than we were supposed to have it. My point: Just because Intel promises great things, that doesn't mean they are going to happen. Didn't Intel also promise 4 GHz P4's?


But Intel has delivered great chips for the PC world in the past years. And IBM was basically delivering to Macs and a couple other people... which is a small business... Intel is practically delivering to the entire PC/Mac world.

Now that I think about it... that might not be such a good thing. If Intel falls (AMDs Dream) the PC/Mac world falls onto AMD and I dont think AMD is ready for taking over the PC/Mac world...

All I no is that I cant wait for a Mac with an Intel Inside Sticker on it! :rolleyes:
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
85 months ago




More found on AnandTech
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
85 months ago
FIVE watts??? That's crazy! If that thing's as fast or faster than the current G4 offerings, that is quite a leap in terms of design...

Now we just wait and see if Intel can deliver.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]