Intel's Plans for Low-Power Chips
...the dominant theme revolves around reducing power consumption, a concept the company has hammered on since the beginning of the decade.
The newer architecture pushing the higher performance per watt appears to be targeted in late 2006. In the meanwhile, Intel has other chips coming to fill the gap in late 2005/early 2006.
Notebooks:
Yonah - notebook chip. 1st half of 2006.
Merom - notebook chip coming in the second half of 2006. 5 watts (vs 22 in today's chips)
Desktops:
Presler - Desktop chip based on Pentium 4 line. 1st half of 2006.
Conroe - Desktop counterpart to Merom. Late 2006. up to 65 watts. (vs 95)
Servers:
Paxville - late 2005. Dual core.
Woodcrest - Server processor, up to 80 watts. (vs 110)
The newly announced chips (Meron, Conroe and Woodcrest) aimed at late 2006 will utilize the new architecture (65-nm) to replace the aging Pentium 4 architecture. Apple anticipates their first Intel-based Macs to start shipping in 2006 and the transition to be complete by the end of 2007.
Top Rated Comments
(View all)Can not wait, its going to be amazing!!
I agree I think this switch needed to happen and will only make things better for mac users... Never thought I would say this but go intel :o
I know, I know...wishful thinking. But a guy's got to have dreams!
:rolleyes:
wondering if the powerbooks will have, specially made processors exclusive for apple.
could anyone put the performance bumo into perspective compared to theG4s or G5
cool
I agree I think this switch needed to happen and will only make things better for mac users... Never thought I would say this but go intel :o
I think we should wait and see. IBM promised 3 GHz, which seemed like a really good thing, and everyone thought that the switch from Motorola to IBM needed to happen. I agree that it made things better, but we're still not at 3 GHz, more than a year later than we were supposed to have it. My point: Just because Intel promises great things, that doesn't mean they are going to happen. Didn't Intel also promise 4 GHz P4's?
I think we should wait and see. IBM promised 3 GHz, which seemed like a really good thing, and everyone thought that the switch from Motorola to IBM needed to happen. I agree that it made things better, but we're still not at 3 GHz, more than a year later than we were supposed to have it. My point: Just because Intel promises great things, that doesn't mean they are going to happen. Didn't Intel also promise 4 GHz P4's?
But Intel has delivered great chips for the PC world in the past years. And IBM was basically delivering to Macs and a couple other people... which is a small business... Intel is practically delivering to the entire PC/Mac world.
Now that I think about it... that might not be such a good thing. If Intel falls (AMDs Dream) the PC/Mac world falls onto AMD and I dont think AMD is ready for taking over the PC/Mac world...
All I no is that I cant wait for a Mac with an Intel Inside Sticker on it! :rolleyes:
Now we just wait and see if Intel can deliver.
[ Read All Comments ]

Analytics firm Chitika today released a report showing that by its metrics iOS has now surpassed OS X in overall web traffic share in the United States. Chitika's methodology involves an analysis...
One of the most frequent reasons for an iPhone to go on a trip to the Apple Store's Genius Bar is because of water damage. Typically, a water damaged iPhone can be replaced for a flat $199...
TheVerge's Joshua Topolsky summarizes the iPad 3 casing findings reported earlier today, but also adds his own sources regarding some details of the iPad 3.
Image from RepairLabs
As...
Last July, Apple discontinued the white MacBook from its consumer lineup, pushing consumers toward the company's popular MacBook Air line or the 13-inch MacBook Pro. The company didn't kill...
Popular iPhone Twitter client Tweetbot has finally arrived on the iPad, with a user interface instantly familiar to any current Tweetbot user. Designed for the Twitter power-user, Tweetbot packs a...