Got a tip for us? Share it...

Patent Suit Filed Against Apple Over iTunes Interface

AppleInsider reports that Contois Music Technology, run by David Contois, filed suit Monday against Apple for patent infringement based on the iTunes interface. David Contois and family run eMusicGear.

According to the suit, persons who were at the time employed by, or later became employed by, Apple were present at both trade shows and viewed Contois' software. The suit charges Apple later "copied" the invention and used the design ideas in the interface for its iTunes software.

Specifically, Contois documented 19 interface aspects of the iTunes software which it claims are in direct violation of its patent. These areas include iTunes' menu selection process for allowing the user to select music to be played, the ability of the software to transfer music tracks to a portable music player, and search capabilities such as sorting music tracks by their genre, artist and album attributes.


From Patent #5,864,868:


January 26, 1999 (filed February 13, 1996)
David C. Contois

Computer control system and user interface for media playing devices

A computer system and method for controlling a media playing device. The system provides a user interface for allowing a user access to media pieces stored in a media database. The interface is also for controlling a media playing device, like a player piano or movie playing video device, that is coupled to the computer to play the accessed or selected piece of media. In one embodiment there is a computer interface that allows a user to display only music that relates to a selected category, like jazz or classical music. Another embodiment allows the user to direct the media playing device to automatically play selected music pieces that are related to a selected music category. Another embodiment allows a user to direct the media playing device to automatically play selected music pieces that are related to the selected music composer or artist.


According to this blog, the suit was filed Monday June 13.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

87 months ago
Clink

I think this suit screams extortion. There are some similarities, but there are only so many ways of displaying music info. Also the search method also in the suit is a standard view of a file system used on many systems.

This is garbage.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
87 months ago
Another example that the US has too many lawyers and that software patenting is a really stupid idea... :rolleyes:
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
87 months ago
my itunes looks quite different from their example. they seem to have dragged the menues and windows in a way that the look at least similar to their software. i doubt that such a broad patent is valid anyway. they just try to get some money out of apple.

well, if you can't earn or marry the money you have to sue for it.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
87 months ago
iTunes has been out for how long?
4 or 5 years?

Should've brought your lawsuit when it first came out if it infringed your patent.

Though it sound a lot like way back when when Apple sued MS for taking elements of the GUI....karma sucks, doesn't it Apple? :rolleyes: ;)
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
87 months ago

Clink

I think this suit screams extortion. There are some similarities, but there are only so many ways of displaying music info. Also the search method also in the suit is a standard view of a file system used on many systems.

This is garbage.

Below are a side-by-side images of the two products posted on the AppleInsider.com website:



For the life of me, I see many more similarities between the plaintiff's player and other Windows-based MP3 players than iTunes. This suit is going nowhere.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
87 months ago
How could the plaintiff be loosing lots of money if he doesn't even have a physical product?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
87 months ago

How could the plaintiff be loosing lots of money if he doesn't even have a physical product?


-Daveway

Opportunity cost.

The plaintiff claims loss of income due to the fact that he feels he should be earning the money and not someone else

Let's put ourselves in the shoe of this guy for a sec, you build this idea - and actually displayed it in a few places, then some year later, an idea that is eerily similar to yours is released. Imagin how that would feel.

His mockup looks like a mirror image of iTunes - and he's been writing Apple on this for a few years now, so it's not like this what is known as "Ambush Litigation". It looks like it's just that now there is a suit - and the news yelled it all over the place.

there might actually be a case here.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
87 months ago
I hope apple fight this, it sounds like a very vague patent. Any why sue now? ITunes has been out since 99 or so right? Sounds like a submarine patent.

Step 1: Patent some thing vague
Step 2: Wait until someone make something even remotely close
Step 3: Wait until they made alot of money
Step 4: SUE
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
87 months ago
Contois has asked the court to issue an injunction to prevent further distribution of iTunes.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
87 months ago
It's hilarious that the album art used in the examples are Frank Mills and Liberace.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]