Got a tip for us? Share it...

Developer Transition Kit Benchmarks

Despite the restriction on publishing benchmarks, the the first Xbench benchmarks are trickling in.

Here is one XBench screenshot showing the developer 3.6GHz Pentium 4 PowerMac running Xbench under the Rosetta emulation. Screenshot

On the left is the Xbench under emulation and on the right is Xbench running on a Dual 2.7GHz PowerMac G5. This simply shows that Rosetta certainly works, but is hard to give us real performance comparisons until the final shipping machines come.

ThinkSecret notes that the Intel Mac scored well in both the Quartz graphics and OpenGL graphics tests "almost matching or exceeding dual-2.5GHz G5 score".

Readers should note, that while all PowerPC native instructions are translated/emulated, since the underlying Mac OS X is running natively on the Intel processor, system tools calls/APIs should enjoy native (not emulated) speeds.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

87 months ago
Wow..that was quick..now we need some pictures of the machines!
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
87 months ago
It would be awesome if someone would explain these two charts in plain english, so some of the less educated among us (including me) can understand everything in its entirety.

EDIT: I accidentally didn't read the Think Secret post. It explained things pretty well.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
87 months ago
NDA's are for losers anyway. :eek:
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
87 months ago
These should be improved by the fact that there are faster Intel processors in the works, coming at a quicker rate than faster PPC processors.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
87 months ago
is macrumors going to get in trouble for publishing this?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
87 months ago

Wow..that was quick..now we need some pictures of the machines!


The machines are simply G5 cases.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
87 months ago
It's too early to tell.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
87 months ago

The machines are simply G5 cases.


I should have specified, I meant the INSIDE of the machines; MB configuration, chipset, etc.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
87 months ago
Well, it's definitely going to have to be a case of "wait and see". The initial benchmarks aren't promising but then we're not expecting to be using development machines in the same way that XBox360 owners won't be expecting a PowerMac when their console arrives. I'm definitely waiting to see what a shipping system will be equipped with before panicking.

One thing is for sure, the disparity in performance between a G5 and P4 in these benchmarks explains why Apple didn't want benchmarks to be posted.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
87 months ago
This is annoying as all hell.

Now the rumors forever are going to be Macs on Intel are slow...blah, blah, bla.

And of course, none of this stuff--hardware, OS, software--has been optimized yet.

This is just noise in the system we don't need.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]