Got a tip for us? Share it...

Apple in Talks with Intel?

This Reuters story revives one of the oldest Mac rumors around... Apple switching to Intel?

The rumor originated at The Wall Street Journal:

The report, citing two industry executives with knowledge of recent discussions between the companies, said Apple will agree to use Intel chips.


Apple has seriously considered switching to Intel at least twice in its history. One previous project code-named Star Trek actually ported Mac OS 7 to Intel based hardware in 1992. Most recently, internal IBM documents noted that Apple considered switching to Intel but felt it would cause too much trouble:

Apple believed that using Intel would deeply affect its current customer base. Using an Intel architecture might solve Apple's short-term megahertz dilemma, but customers would have to suffer through a slow transition from PowerPC over the long term.



Such a switch would traditionally require recompilation of applications, but Page 2 rumors have suggested the use of Transitive Technologies' software which claims to "dynamically translate and accelerate binaries" up to 80% performance matching, as well as unconfirmed reports of x86 seeds of Mac OS X 10.4 (Tiger).

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

88 months ago
I find this impossible to believe. I think the recent announcements of Xbox 360 and PS3 (which both contain processors manufactured by IBM, though the latter wasn't developed solely by IBM) show that IBM has some major potential in being the future of the processor industry. Furthermore, even if Apple wasn't going to use IBM, it looks to me like Intel should be the last choice, as AMD has passed them up again in terms of performance.

Bottom line: The only way I think this can be true is if Intel has some big new thing coming out that Apple knows about and we do not.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
88 months ago
Intel has consistently been ahead of IBM, and I see no reason to suspect this will change in the near future. Maybe it's a good idea?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
88 months ago
If apple chose to switch to intel now they would be choosing the worst time in a decade- with evry other manufacturer making the move to powerpc- even microsoft, it would be stupid to move at a time when intel could eventually be left high and dry.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
88 months ago

I find this impossible to believe. I think the recent announcements of Xbox 360 and PS3 (which both contain processors manufactured by IBM, though the latter wasn't developed solely by IBM) show that IBM has some major potential in being the future of the processor industry. Furthermore, even if Apple wasn't going to use IBM, it looks to me like Intel should be the last choice, as AMD has passed them up again in terms of performance.

Bottom line: The only way I think this can be true is if Intel has some big new thing coming out that Apple knows about and we do not.


+1 . But i would hate it, hate the Intel music thingy at the end of the adds
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
88 months ago
Looking at recent Apple patents, maybe it's for a centrino processor for a PDA/Tablet type device. A huge platform shift from OS9 to OSX took quite some time. Imagine how long it would take to transition to a different HW architecture, not to mention the amount of time and cost to ALL OS X software developers. I find it highly unlikely that Apple would change to x86 on the Mac platform.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
88 months ago

+1 . But i would hate it, hate the Intel music thingy at the end of the adds


AFAIK you do not have to do this, it just gives you some money from Intels PR pool... I strongly doubt that Apple would do this :)
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
88 months ago
Does this mean that Mac OS would be designed to run on any old POS intel box, or would Apple just be buying in intel chips to put in Macs?

I presume its the latter, but that this could be the first step towards the former.

I don't believe it, although I bet Steve is still mightily p1ssed off with whoever told him he'd have 3Ghz chips by LAST summer ;)
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
88 months ago
Can IBM keep up with Apple? I don't think it is a Mhz issue more than a demand issue.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
88 months ago
This has all came before - you'd think they'd go for Cell instead of Intel? They'd open up a wealth of applications and games, but they'd possibly lose
their devoted Mac fans. Can you imagine a neat little 'Intel Inside' on the front of your G5? Never! They'll stick with IBM.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
88 months ago
If they already have an OS ported to run on Intel, and it opens up new markets and/or offers opportunities for greater performance, why shouldn't they partner with significant others?

Manogomy? Humbug. They shifted from Motorola to IBM and no one lost any sleep over it. You think they're abandoning their core customers? Don't be silly. My trusty old G3/400 still works, still runs Tiger, and will do so for the foreseeable future.

If a partnership with Intel positions Apple for greater exposure and higher heights, then I have no problem with it.

In reading the previous post, it does seem more likely that this partnership may be for a PDA/Tablet type product, but whatever it is I hope it makes a tidal splash.

Go, baby, go.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]