Got a tip for us? Share it...

iMac/eMac Rumor Wrapup: Winners and Losers

Apple released new iMacs and price dropped eMacs on Tuesday, Feb 4th, 2003. After each product release, MacRumors provides a wrapup of rumors to reveal the sources of the most accurate information.



Despite rumors of 19" iMacs last year -- Apple doesn't seem to agree. Beyond that, Spymac, MacOSRumors, and MacBidouille posted rumors in 2002 that the iMac would arrive at MacWorld San Francisco 2003. ThinkSecret put a stop to those rumors in the days before MWSF, and this information turned out to be accurate -- MWSF came and went without iMac upgrades.



Attention was drawn towards the PowerMac/Display upgrades in the subsequent weeks, with Thinksecret first suggesting Feb 3rd as a tentative week for iMac updates. Meanwhile MacRumors sources provided a solid date of Feb 4th, as well as definitive details of the high-end iMac upgrade (though midrange price point info was incorrect). Thinksecret then posted last minute price point of $1299 for the iMac, filling out the bottom end of the line, as well as details of eMac price drops.



MacNews.net.tc initially posted $999-$1699 specs which were echoed by Appleinsider immediately before the release. These specs were wrong, with no apparent basis, casting further doubts on these sources for future specs.



Summary



As mentioned before, accurate rumors are available... but with the influx of rumor sites, it's often difficult to discern accurate information from pure speculation.



It seems speculation and "predictions" are often passed off as rumors -- these practices should be discouraged and any purely speculative information is frowned upon (unless specifically stated as such), as it simply muddies the water and further incites unreasonable expectations amongst readers.



Some of this may be unavoidable, as frequently, sources of rumors may simply be based on unconfirmed reader contribution which has been known to miss their mark.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

118 months ago
Yeah too many new rumor sites coming out of no where...
I mean there are just getting to be too many 'our vulcan mind tricks' tell us there will be a new iMac released, uh, tommorow. Sure it is based on other rumors, but no ones to back it up.
Arn your doing a great job filtering BS from reality.

Edit: FIRST POST. w00t. ;)
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
118 months ago
There were correct rumors out there. The only thing that I think everyone got wrong was the clock speed of the base model. Correct me if I'm wrong, (and I am sure someone will if I am :)) but didn't ever rumor have a 867 MHz iMac?

Anyway, good job MacRumors. Keep it up.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
118 months ago

Originally posted by Freg3000
There were correct rumors out there. The only thing that I think [B]everyone got wrong was the clock speed of the base model. Correct me if I'm wrong, (and I am sure someone will if I am :)) but didn't ever rumor have a 867 MHz iMac? [/B]


Well, MacNews.net.tc posted a low end iMac at 800mhz... but they also reported 17" LCD's in 3 other models.

Hitting one or two numbers in Mhz doesn't count... especially when everything else is wrong. Unique hits... for example if they claimed it would be 823.2 Mhz and it turned out to be true... well, then I'd pay attention.

arn
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
118 months ago

Originally posted by arn
Unique hits... for example if they claimed it would be 823.2 Mhz and it turned out to be true... well, then I'd pay attention.

arn


Unique hits...like nailing 12" and 17" Powerbooks @ MWSF :D? I am still getting over that one!
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
118 months ago

Originally posted by arn


Well, MacNews.net.tc posted a low end iMac at 800mhz... but they also reported 17" LCD's in 3 other models.

Hitting one or two numbers in Mhz doesn't count... especially when everything else is wrong. Unique hits... for example if they claimed it would be 823.2 Mhz and it turned out to be true... well, then I'd pay attention.

arn


Is 823.2 even possible? :D
(just pulling your hypotheical leg)
Yeah the 12 & 17 " Powerbooks were out of no where.
I suppose super hush hush.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
118 months ago
MacOSRumours just the other day said "6-8 weeks" for iMac/eMac rumours. Needless to say, they have been deleted from my bookmarks, they're just ridiculous now.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
118 months ago
People, like me, wanting a new iPod are also losers today.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
118 months ago

Originally posted by MrMacman


Is 823.2 even possible? :D
(just pulling your hypotheical leg)


Well, it would be one strange multiplier....:)
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
118 months ago

Originally posted by unfaded
MacOSRumours just the other day said "6-8 weeks" for iMac/eMac rumours. Needless to say, they have been deleted from my bookmarks, they're just ridiculous now.


they're the most pathetic site out there. just to think... 5 years ago, they were mecca... Ryan Meader, what the heck happened?!?!?!
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
118 months ago

Originally posted by reiggin


they're the most pathetic site out there. just to think... 5 years ago, they were mecca... Ryan Meader, what the heck happened?!?!?!


his contacts died? got laid off?

they are a little weird; anyone who regularly speculates about quad processors lol.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]