MacRumors.com Apple LCD Displays Rumors Summary
This newest display brought a 23" 1920x1200 pixel resolution display into their LCD product line. Now with 15", 17", 22" and 23" sizes.
The only hint about the 23" Display was a small mention in an EETimes article in January. This same EETimes article reported that Apple was working on other flat-planel technologies "including stereoscopic displays"... fueling the minds of Apple-fans.
Since that time, rumor-mongers have been speculating that the rest of Apple's LCD line would also be updated... but information has been relatively scarce.
Original rumors of an update to the rest of Apple's LCD line began in December from RailHeadDesign.com. At that time, the 15" display was to be dropped, and a new 19inch model introduced.
However, at the following expo (MWSF02), no new LCD's were introduced, but we did see the introduction of the 15" LCD iMac. Rising LCD prices throughout 2002 may have aborted the introduction of these rumored displays. These economic conditions also forced Apple to increase the price of the iMac during this time -- partially due to the rising cost of LCD Displays. With prices stabilizing later this year... there is hope that display upgrades will be seen sooner rather than later.
In April, Spymac echoed a similar report of a new 19" Apple LCD model... but with a MacWorld SanFrancisco 2003 target date. Recent aggressive rebates for current Apple LCD Displays may pave the way for future upgrades and price cuts.
Top Rated Comments
(View all)Truth Hertz...
does anyone know what the lifespan on the backlight of one of these things is? i'd hate to have to replace such an expensive item.
if apple is going to produce a 19" with the same specs and look of the current models i'd rather just buy the 22". the display rebate ended yesterday and there still is no word from apple about new displays or whether they will extend the rebate.
oh well, whats a mac user to do...
People here have talked about duel monitoring the iMacs and have also talked about stand alone 19" screens.
I'd like to see a 17 or 19 inch screen on an imac base that is just the screen on top of a base that just holds the screen and arm, and connects to the iMac (with computer) with a base to base connector.
I'd buy a 19" iMac and a second 19" iScreen. Connect the two and you'd then have two floating screens on your desk. Put the iPod dock between the two, and you've got a system I'd buy in a heartbeat.
I'm thinking this is the way I'll be going when I get a new computer.
http://www.formac.com/
D
The ability to double the smaller and less expensive monitors leaves me wondering why anyone would buy the larger and more expensive monitors. But, I guess I've just grown used to running dual monitors. I actually like the break between the two.
Originally posted by dukestreet
Apple will need to get on the ball with the 19" wideformat soon, Formac is putting out a 20.1" LCD that looks damn good and has the same native res as the 23" - but at half the cost. So you could buy 2 20.1" for the same price as a single 23".
I'm thinking this is the way I'll be going when I get a new computer.
http://www.formac.com/
D
Actually, the Formac is a standard 4:3@1600x1200.
The 23" Cinema is 16:10@1920x1200.
:)
What am I waiting for? The hardware is just not quite "there" for me yet. Faster (hyper) bus speeds would help. The supposedly impending decision on which processor is going to power their future machines really needs to be addressed - and soon! If Apple is staying with Motorolla or moving to IBM... I'm going to need to know this BEFORE I switch over.
You see, for a PC user, looks *do* count for something (does the term "case-mod" sound familiar?) but what's under that shell counts more. I (we) need to know that we're buying the absolute best that the manufacturer we're staking our hard-earned cash on can make. We'd also like to be fairly comfortable with the knowledge that there won't be any major architectural changes that would put our new purchase in an obsolete class by itself (as would happen should Apple one day announce that next year's model will be built on IBM's CPU running at twice today's speed and 5 times the bus traffic).
For now, I'm still straining my neck as I look over the fence at Apple's latest offerings - and still waiting for that last feature set (internal hardware bandwidths) to sway me. Here's hoping!
as for the main topic. Apple is overdue for refreshing the monitor line. They still have stupid pinstripes in them. They cost about 50% more than comparable LCDs from other companies. Their contrast ratio's aren't great, and there is still a problem with poor viewing angle which really needs improvement if they're asking such high prices. A 19" should be $999. A 17" should be $599, and a 15" should be $349. They'd still make a hefty profit on them and would likely sell many, many more. Their LCD prices haven't dropped in 18 months (minus the Cinema displays), and no other LCDs can say that.
Originally posted by robguz
Apple is overdue for refreshing the monitor line. They still have stupid pinstripes in them. They cost about 50% more than comparable LCDs from other companies. Their contrast ratio's aren't great, and there is still a problem with poor viewing angle which really needs improvement if they're asking such high prices. A 19" should be $999. A 17" should be $599, and a 15" should be $349. They'd still make a hefty profit on them and would likely sell many, many more. Their LCD prices haven't dropped in 18 months (minus the Cinema displays), and no other LCDs can say that.
Apple's monitors have one thing that necessitates them costing more: the ADC. While ADC is a fantastically simple and elegant solution to video/power/USB cabling, it does make the monitors cost more. Also, the fact that they have ADC means that they sell primarily to Apple computer customers, meaning that they do not sell in the same sort of volume as, say, a DVI/VGA based LCD designed for the PC standards. This, sadly, means that revenue must come from high prices instead of high volume. You are completely right to say that the prices should have come down on the smaller monitors, given the time frame; the only thing keeping me with my 17" Apple Studio CRT with ADC is the steep price structure on Apple LCDs. The only reason I haven't gotten another brand of LCD is that it would feel like a cobbled together substitute compared to the ADC connector.
As far as the pinstripes are concerned, they will probably stay as long as the pinstripe motif remains a part of Aqua. It can be a nice touch for the monitor and OS to look like they go together.
RL
Originally posted by robguz
Sorry, but you gotta be nuts to even consider formac. They have the worst customer service and tech support in the mac industry. They lied to me repeatedly, failed to return my calls and emails, and sold me a CDRW which fried my firewire, necessitating a logic board replacement. That company ought to be shut down. I can't tell you how many threads I've come across on various forums about people and their Formac horror stories.
OK thats your own issue with their CDRWs. The topic here is LCDs and Formacs monitors are as good as LCDs come, especially the new 2010. I haven't heard any complaints about thier monitors and they seem to have great reviews. check out cnet.com. Although Apple LCD are visually pleasing (even with their pinstripes) they lack in modern LCD technology. Does anyone know when the 15', 17' and 22' came out. I know the 23' came out in april 2002 but im guess the other ones are over 2 years old. They need to really hurry up with a model makeover.
Personanly I bought the 2010 and have had no issues with thier customer service. I wanted a monitor with an ADC connection and a similar look to my Powermac. Formac is the only other company that does this. And i wanted a monitor that is between 17-22 inches for video editing. I dont have room on my desk for two 15s or 17s so Formac's 20.1 inch one is a great deal. Ohh yeah now their contrast radio is 100% better then the 22' Apple LCD. 600:1, now you can't be that with any LCD.
tyler
[ Read All Comments ]

Analytics firm Chitika today released a report showing that by its metrics iOS has now surpassed OS X in overall web traffic share in the United States. Chitika's methodology involves an analysis...
One of the most frequent reasons for an iPhone to go on a trip to the Apple Store's Genius Bar is because of water damage. Typically, a water damaged iPhone can be replaced for a flat $199...
TheVerge's Joshua Topolsky summarizes the iPad 3 casing findings reported earlier today, but also adds his own sources regarding some details of the iPad 3.
Image from RepairLabs
As...
Last July, Apple discontinued the white MacBook from its consumer lineup, pushing consumers toward the company's popular MacBook Air line or the 13-inch MacBook Pro. The company didn't kill...
Popular iPhone Twitter client Tweetbot has finally arrived on the iPad, with a user interface instantly familiar to any current Tweetbot user. Designed for the Twitter power-user, Tweetbot packs a...